Nazism
31 December 2007
The downside of the British Empire
I haven’t quite finished Adam Tooze’s The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy but I think it is worth posting an interim review of this monumental3 economic history of the Third Reich while the stuff at the beginning of the book is still fresh in my mind.
The thing that most struck me - and rather unsettled me - was Tooze’s description of Hitler’s underlying philosophy. The rabid anti-semitism is as well known as it is bizarre - how exactly you convince yourself that Jews run capitalism as well as communism is beyond me. But it’s the stuff about empire and economics that is was surprising.
Hitler’s Weltanschauung goes like this:
- I want Germany to be rich
- I look around the world to find examples of rich countries
- I find Britain, France and the United States.
- They all have empires1.
- That’s why they’re rich - certainly not this liberal economics nonsense which is just there to pull the wool over the eyes of the workers
- Therefore if Germany is to be rich she must have an empire
- We can’t go North, West or South.
- Therefore, we must go East.
- Sure, there are people in the way but we will treat them just the same way as the Americans treated the Indians or the British treated the, er, Indians.